0092 3125718857
WhatsApp for More Details
How to Prepare a Research Proposal 2017
1. 1 – 3 pages
2. 3 – 7 pages
3. 7 – 15 pages
4. 15 – 20 pages
1. a research question
2. a list of references
3. a detailed literature review
4. a research timetable
1. a gap in the literature needs to be addressed
2. an unusual or improved methodology is to be used
3. the research may benefit policy and practice
4. all of the above
1. should commit you to a plan of action
2. should be a substantial part of the proposal
3. should show your project is well organised and achievable
4. is the same as the research timetable
Check your answers at the end of the article …..
A research proposal is a document of usually three to seven pages that informs others of a proposed piece of research. This proposed research is usually a Masters or Doctorate by thesis, but it can also be work for a corporate purpose. University students usually write research proposals for academics who may eventually supervise the work based on the proposal.
A research proposal can be rejected as unsuitable or poorly designed and on the basis of this, a piece of research can be rejected. The proposal is, therefore, an important document; one that is worth spending some time on to get right.
Another reason to get the proposal right is that this can save you time in the long run.
If the proposal is well-designed, it can form an outline of the thesis to follow, and ideally, can be mapped onto various parts of the final thesis.
The elements of the research proposal: overview
This Helpsheet addresses the main elements listed above.
The introduction should be as brief as possible (a paragraph or two). Whatever you do, don’t ramble on for pages; you need to make this part of the proposal clear and crisp.
In the introduction, you need to give a sense of the general field of research of which your area is a part. You then need to narrow to the specific area of your concern. This should lead logically to the gap in the research that you intend to fill. When the gap is identified, a research question can then be raised. The answer to this question is called the thesis statement.
Note that the thesis statement may only be tentative at this stage as the research has not been carried out. It is not expected in a proposal that you have an answer to your research question. This is what the thesis provides. However, it helps if you have a tentative answer. A hypothesis is useful for this purpose, though this might only be necessary for more empirical subjects (Economics, for example).
This forms Section 1.4 of the final thesis. Note that the research question may not be a question as such, but rather a statement of a problem to be investigated.
Below is an example. Note the move from a general area, to a specific area, to the gap in the research (the first italicised passage) and then to the proposed thesis statement (the second italicised passage):
According to business marketing theory, businesses are more likely to succeed if they utilise marketing management approaches or techniques. For example, the marketing concept, a cornerstone of business marketing thought, stresses the importance of determining the needs and wants of consumers and delivering the desired satisfaction more effectively and efficiently than competitors (Kotler, 1986) Philosophies from marketing management ha ve recently been applied to almost every industry from insurance to travel and hospital services, but not often to farming. Concerns have been raised about the distinction which appears to exist between agricultural and business marketing theory (Bartels, 1983; Bateman, 1976; Muelenberg, 1986).
In this research proposal, the role of marketing management in agricultural marketing theory and practice is described. It is argued that the marketing strategies of farmers are not adequately described by either the business or agricultural marketing disciplines, and a methodology for analysing the farm business marketing strategy process is outlined (Adapted from McLeay (1)
The research question in this case is really a statement of what needs to be investigated. This is a perfectly acceptable way of putting this part of the introduction.
However, it could also be phrased in the form of a question or formal hypothesis.
One page is usually sufficient for this (2), suggests that writers need to tell the reader that the research can justified along four main criteria:
The example provided above could clearly be justified along all criteria.
This is where you provide more detail about what others have done in the area, and what you propose to do. You need to write around two pages in which you cover the following:
The preliminary literature review eventually becomes Chapter 2 of the thesis.
Perry suggests that potential candidates read a thesis in a similar area to get a feel for what is required in this section
An examination of textbook definitions of business and agricultural marketing provides the most general guide to theoretical content. Although there is no generally accepted definition of agricultural marketing, it is frequently viewed as part of the economic system (Ritson, 1986; Bateman, 1976) and is widely recognised as involving the exchange process. A typical definition is given by Shepard and Futrell (1982) who state: ‘ …’. By this definition, agricultural marketing theory focuses on the workings of the distribution system, and is typically viewed as a process that begins after produce leaves the farm gate. … Thus production planning is frequently excluded from the marketing process. …
Although, there is no universally accepted definition of business marketing, it is generally accepted that business marketing, like agricultural marketing, involves the exchange process. For example, Kotler (1972, p. 12) defines marketing as: “…”… (adapted from McLeay (4) ).
Note how the writer refers to definitions of key terms and makes distinctions to eventually arrive at the contribution of their own research to the debate.
The theoretical framework usually forms the final part of the literature review section. It describes the model that you are using in the thesis to demonstrate your point. See Sekaran (5)
This forms Section 1.6 of the final thesis. In this section, you outline how your research will make a change to an area of study. This is different from the justification of your research. The justification explains why the research should be done. The contribution section explains how what you will do will lead to certain outcomes. You need to outline:
The outcome could be the extension of a theoretical model to a new area, or it could be something practical such as the development of a checklist for managers.
The limitations of research section, can go in this section. This will become Section 1.7 of the final thesis.
This section should be about 1-2 pages. It forms Chapter 3 of the final thesis.
You do not have to describe the methodology to be used in great detail, but you should justify its use over other methodologies. For example, you could explain the reasons for using:
You could also explain how you are proposing to:
You also need to provide operational(ie. testable, or at least well-supported in the literature) definitions of key terms (see Sekaran (6) ;Perry (7) ).
The research plan or outline can be discussed in conjunction with a research timetable. However, be aware that they have a different function.
The research plan or outline lists what will be covered in each chapter or section of the proposed thesis. This helps you as well as the reader as:
You need only provide one or two lines for each. This becomes Section 1.7 of the final thesis.
The timetable should indicate the weighting of each part of the proposed thesis in percentage terms, the topics covered, approximate word limit and, importantly, the approximate length of time it will take to complete them. You might consider providing a graph for convenience.
Chapter | Topic | % | Words | Months |
1 | Introduction | 5 | 3,500 | 3 |
2 | Literature Review | 30 | 21,000 | 6 |
3 | Methodology | 20 | 14,000 | 4 |
4 | Data analysis | 25 | 17,500 | 5 |
5 | Conclusions and Implications | 20 | 14,000 | 6 |
TOTAL | 100 | 70,000 | 24 |
(From Perry(8) ; see also Phillips(9) )
Note that:
This must be provided in the usual scholarly fashion. It helps to convince your reader that your proposal is worth pursuing if you can identify literature in the field and demonstrate that you understand it. It makes a very strong impact if you can identify where there is a research gap in the literature that your proposal hopes to fill. This is your contribution to the scholarly conversation.
In-text references should be provided for all sections of the proposal with the exception of the research plan and timetable.
Note finally that while the proposal can be mapped onto the final thesis, much work needs to be done. The proposal merely provides a shell and the thesis fills in the details. Parts of the proposal are not required in a final thesis (for example, resources and evaluation, and timetable). The order and arrangement of each document is slightly different too as the diagram below shows.
Proposal | Thesis/Final Project |
1. Introduction | 1. Introduction |
1.1 General area | 1.1 General area |
1.2 Specific topic | 1.2 Specific topic |
1.3 Gap | 1.3 Gap |
1.4 Research Question | 1.4 Research Question |
1.5 Thesis Statement | 1.5 Thesis Statement |
2. Literature Review | 1.6 Contribution |
3. Theoretical Framework | 1.7 Thesis outline/Limitations |
4. Methodology | 2. Literature Review |
5. Contribution | 3. Methodology |
6. Research Plan and Timetable | 4. Data Analysis |
7. References | 5. Conclusions and Implications |
6. References | |
7. Appendices |
Note that variations in the above are possible.
Martin Davies (2011), Study Skills for International Postgraduate Students. Basingstoke, UK.: Palgrave, MacMillan. as cited in this link